Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Abhishek Sonkar vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28471 of 2021 Applicant :- Abhishek Sonkar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shabana Nizam,Satyendra Narayan Singh,Shambhavi Nandan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Despite service of notice on respondent no.2, none has appeared on his behalf to oppose the application. Accordingly, the application is being proceeded on merits.
2. Heard Sri S.B. Singh, learned counsel holding brief of learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashwani Prakash Tripathi, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Abhishek Sonkar, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. -0056 of 2021, under Sections -363, 366, 376 I.P.C. and 5/6 of Prevention of Sexual Offences against the Children Act, Police Station -Jafrabad, District -Jaunpur, during pendency of trial.
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, at present:
(i) against FIR lodged on 26.04.2021, the applicant is in confinement since 18.06.2021;
(ii) the applicant claims to have cooperated in the investigation. In any case he is not shown to have unduly evaded arrest;
(iii) the applicant has no criminal history;
(iv) though chargesheet has already been submitted, there is no hope of early conclusion of the trial;
(v) on prima facie basis, only for purpose of grant of bail, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that though vague allegation has been made in the FIR, in her statement recorded during investigation, the victim girl has materially diluted the prosecution allegation.
(vi) in any case, no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the final merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressuring the witness, during the investigation or trial.
(ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
6. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, the bail being granted shall be cancelled.
7. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 23.12.2021 S.Chaurasia
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Abhishek Sonkar vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 December, 2021
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Shabana Nizam Satyendra Narayan Singh Shambhavi Nandan