Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Abhishek @ Oshik @ Anubhav Mehra vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31774 of 2021 Applicant :- Abhishek @ Oshik @ Anubhav Mehra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.32 of 2021, under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C. and 7/8 POCSO Act, P.S. Dildar Nagar, District Ghazipur.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to F.I.R. version on 10.02.2021 at about 7:30 p.m. victim aged about 14 years was enticed away by unknown person. In statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the victim has stated that she herself went to Delhi where she called the applicant, who asked her to return back but on her resistance he took her to his house where she stayed for two days and she used to sleep along with his sister and she also stated that when she ran out of money she asked for money from the applicant and applicant called his friend to which he denied and thereafter called back to take more money when the applicant and victim went to the station to take the money they were caught by the police. He submits that victim has not levelled any allegation against the applicant. There is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. There is no criminal history of the applicant and is languishing in jail since 17.02.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the factual aspects.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, in statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. the victim has not levelled any allegation against him, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant- Abhishek @ Oshik @ Anubhav Mehra involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 27.9.2021 Jitendra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Abhishek @ Oshik @ Anubhav Mehra vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2021
Judges
  • Ali Zamin
Advocates
  • Ajeet Srivastava