Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Abdul Rahman And Others vs A D M F/R Saharanpur And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9625 of 2003 Petitioner :- Abdul Rahman And Others Respondent :- A.D.M. F/R Saharanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Prasad,Sudhanshu Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
None appears to press the writ petition even in the revised call. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Learned Standing counsel is directed to communicate this order to the authorities concerned.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 Ujjawal
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Abdul Rahman And Others vs A D M F/R Saharanpur And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Birla
Advocates
  • Vinod Prasad Sudhanshu Srivastava

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.