Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Abdul Rahman Sait vs The State Rep. By

Madras High Court|09 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This petition has been filed to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.60 of 2016, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the second respondent and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the first respondent.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that based on the complaint given by the second respondent/de facto complainant, a case has been registered against the petitioner in Crime No.438 of 2015, for the offences under Sections 120(b),365 and 511 of IPC., on the file of the first respondent police and after filing final report and the same was taken on file as C.C.No.60 of 2016 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy.
4. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, both the petitioner as well as the second respondent are appeared in person and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) through the respondent police and they categorically made a statement that the dispute between them have been settled amicably. They also filed a joint memo of compromise dated 08.12.2016, duly signed by both parties and counter signed by their respective Counsel.
5. In view of the above, since the dispute between the parties was amicably settled out of Court, there is no necessity to keep this case pending. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.438 of 2015, for the offences under Sections 120(b),365 and 511 IPC., on the file of the first respondent and the consequential proceedings in C.C.No.60 of 2016, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy, is hereby quashed. The joint memo of compromise shall form a part of this order.
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy.
2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Trichy District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Abdul Rahman Sait vs The State Rep. By

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
09 January, 2017