Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Abdul Mansoor Ahmed vs Nazeem Banu

Madras High Court|24 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Petitioners seek quash of proceedings in D.V.No.26 of 2014 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram.
2. First petitioner and first respondent are husband and wife. Petitioners 2 to 4 are in-laws of first respondent. Second respondent is the daughter of first petitioner and first respondent. Respondents moved D.V.No.26 of 2014 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram, seeking return of sreedhana articles and compensation towards damages. Seeking quash of such proceedings, the present petition has been moved.
3. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for respondents.
Presently, a joint compromise memo signed by both parties as also the respective counsel informing settlement of disputes between them and payment of a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- by first petitioner to respondents in full and final settlement, is filed. The same also informs that the first petitioner will not claim custody of the child in future. Following the decision of the Honourable Apex Court in B.S.Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another [AIR 2003 SCC 1386], this Court allows this petition. The proceedings in D.V.No.26 of 2014 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram, is quashed. The joint compromise memo and the Talaq (Mubara'a) Nama entered into between parties shall form part of the record. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 24.03.2017 Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no gm To The Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram.
C.T.SELVAM, J gm Crl.O.P.No.27542 of 2014 24.03.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Abdul Mansoor Ahmed vs Nazeem Banu

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
24 March, 2017