The only grievance of the petitioner is that the court below passed orders in the applications for amendment and impeadment without giving notice to the petitioner and unfortunately, it was after the amendment was allowed that the petitioner was served with notice that too without the amendment being carried out. 2. Whatever that be, certainly, the procedure adopted by the court below cannot be sustained and it is not in accordance with law.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that his anxiety is only that such order should not have been passed without ensuring notice had been served.
The court below shall take every endevour in future not to O.P.(C) No.3402/2012 2 pass any orders without notice to the respective parties.
With the above observation, this Original Petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE smp