This writ petition is filed challenging the communication of the second respondent to the first respondent dated 11.01.2017 stating that No Objection Certificate sought for by the petitioner to run a restaurant was not recommended for want of sufficient parking space.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner produced the remarks of the second respondent dated 27.02.2017 indicating that the No Objection Certificate has not been recommended earlier only on the traffic point of view and now, in view of the valet parking agreement provided by the petitioner for the purpose of parking the vehicles of its customers, No Objection Certificate may be recommended.
3. In such view of the matter, the relief sought for in the writ petition is no longer survives. Accordingly, the second respondent is directed to send No Objection Certificate as indicated in the decision taken on 27.02.2017 to the first respondent, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, the first respondent is directed to consider the request of the petitioner seeking trade licence for running a hotel and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks thereafter.
4. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
27.03.2017 Note: Issue order copy on 03.04.2017 Index:Yes/No raa To
1.The Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Zonal Office 13, No.115, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai, Adyar, Chennai-600 020.
2.The Additional Commissioner of Police (Traffic), Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
raa W.P.No.4429 of 2017 27.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in