Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Aasib @ Lalla vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 January, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
The present application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking bail in FIR No.949 of 2020, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Mohamdi, District Kheri.
Provisions of the Gangsters Act have been invoked against the accused-applicant on the basis of one case registered under Sections 3/5/8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. There are four accused in the gang chart. There is no criminal history of the accused-applicant except for the aforesaid case. The accused-applicant has been in jail since 28.1.2020.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but not disputed the aforesaid facts.
Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, coupled with the contentions raised by the learned counsel for both sides, and without entering into the merit of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let applicant Aasib @ Lalla be released on bail in the above case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The accused-applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs.30,000/- in the account of U.P. Gosewa Ayog (A/c No.98160100004196, Bank of Baroda, University Road, Lucknow IFSC BARB0EXTLUC) within a period of four weeks from the date of his release and submit a receipt thereof before the trial court. In case of failure to deposit the aforesaid amount within the stipulated period, his bail shall be treated to have been cancelled and he shall be taken into custody forthwith.
(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
The party shall file self attested computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and the concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 25.1.2021 Rao/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Aasib @ Lalla vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 January, 2021
Judges
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh