The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue Patta in her favour, by considering the representation dated 17.06.2017, within a time frame.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2017, for issuance of patta , the 2nd respondent has not considered the same yet.
3. Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents submitted that the second respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties.
4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2017 for issuance of patta and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With this observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
29.06.2017 mfa/rg To
1. The District Collector, Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai District.
2. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Chengam, Tiruvannamalai District.
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
mfa/rg W.P.No.16278 of 2017 29.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in