1. Learned counsel Mr.B.P.Tanna had expressed his inability in arguing for want of instructions and even now he submitted that none of the petitioners were contacting him and his office was unable to communicate with any of them. He further submitted that the petitioners have received and enjoyed benefits of the ad-interim relief granted herein and confirmed on 17.12.1994 while admitting the petition. He, therefore, submitted that disposal of the petition may result into some retrospective action by the respondents and cause unnecessary complications for the petitioners. Learned A.G.P., appearing for the respondents, submitted that at present she was unable to make any statement as regards stand of the State or survival in service or otherwise of any of the petitioners.
2. In these facts, the petitions are disposed and Rule is discharged with no order as to costs and with liberty to the parties to apply for its revival in case of necessity.
Sd/-
( D.H.Waghela, J.) (KMG Thilake) Top