THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE O.S.A.No.52 of 2017 A.Subramanyam ... Appellant vs.
M/s.S.S.A.M.Shanmuga Nadar A partnership Firm, represented by its Partners.
1.S.S.A.M.S.Ramasamy 2.S.S.A.M.S.Kathiresan ... Respondents Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 11 of O.S.Rules read with Clauses 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 26.07.2016 made in C.S.No.605 of 2010.
For Appellant : Mr.Dhanasekar for Mr.K.Rajasekaran For Respondents : Mr.T.L.L.Ramakrishnan
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
and ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsm
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.]
1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal.
1.1. Learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect on the paper book.
2. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
(R.S.A., J.) (A.Q., J.) vsm 18.09.2017
O.S.A.No.52 of 2017