IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.29059 OF 2019 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
Smt.A.Rasheeda Begam W/o late Dadapeer Aged about 43 years, R/at C/o Mahanthesh Nilaya, Behind Shimoga Gas Office, Jail Road, Hosamane, 5th Cross, Shimoga – 577 201.
(By Sri.Naveed Ahmed, Advocate) AND:
1. State of Karnataka, Home Department, Vidhan Soudha, Bengaluru – 560 001. Rep. by its Secretary.
2. Director General of Police, Nrupathunga Road, Bengaluru – 560 001.
3. The Commander, 8th Batalian Karnataka State Reserve Police, Machanhalli, Shimoga – 577 222.
... Petitioner ... Respondents (By Sri.B.Balakrishna, AGA) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the respondent to consider the representation/requisition of the petitioner dated 28.10.2014 and 23.02.2017 i.e., at Annexure-A1 and A2 respectively.
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing, this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Sri.Naveed Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.B.Balakrishna, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondent to consider the representation/requisition of the petitioner dated 28.10.2014 and 23.02.2017 i.e., at Annexure-A1 and A2 respectively.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider and decide the representations dated 28.10.2014 and 23.02.2017 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents submitted that the representations submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that respondent Nos.2 and 3 shall consider and decide the representations submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-