Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

A Parveen vs The Chief Educational Officer And Others

Madras High Court|22 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
22.11.2017 Index: Yes/No AT To
1. The Chief Educational Officer, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.
2. The Head Master, P.R.Govt.Higher Secondary School (Boys) Nagarasampatti, Krishnagiri District.
3. The Member Secretary, Teacher Recruitment Board, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.
4. The Director of School Education, (Higher Secondary), College Road, Chennai – 600 006.
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
AT W.P.No.23135 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 22.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

A Parveen vs The Chief Educational Officer And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 November, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban