IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1746 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ) Between:
A. M. JAGADAMBAL DAUGHTER OF LATE MURUGESH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDENT OF NO.1956 SANKARA VILLAS, LAVELLE ROAD ROBERTSONPET KGF.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI.KISHOR KUMAR.H.M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) And:
DEVAKUMAR SON OF MUNISWAMY RESIDENT OF NO.518, 2ND CROSS ROBERTSONPET, KGF.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 11.01.2016 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN RA NO. 47/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND PRL. JMC., K.G.F., DISMISSING THE IA NO.1 NO.1 AND DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.03.2013 PASSED IN OS NO. 335/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC., K.G.F.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 29.08.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this preemptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SA Ct:sr Sd/- Judge