IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO R.F.A.No.463/2005 BETWEEN:
SMT.A KALARANI MAJOR IN AGE ( YEARS) WIFE OF V ANGASWAMY No. 4, II CROSS, MARISWAMY MUTT LANE COTTONPET BANGALORE-560 053.
…APPELLANT (BY SRI G NARASI REDDY, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND:
SMT.M MUTHULAKSHMI MAJOR IN AGE( YEARS) WIFE OF A MUTHUSWAMY No.100, POLICE ROAD RANASINGHPET BANGALORE-560 053. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI C V NAGESH, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:9.2.2005 PASSED IN OS No.1575/1989 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY (CCH.No.2), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
2 THIS RFA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Counsel for the appellant and respondent absent. No representation. Matter is called for the third time. It is set down for Final Hearing. The matter is of the year 2005 resultant original suit is of the year 1989. Thus, the age of the case is 30 years and yet to find the light of disposal. It appears appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE tsn*