Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1558607b7c74787874795558607b7c7e747b7b60">[email&#xA0;protected]</a> vs <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e4f60606f636f626f674e456b6b7c6f6765656f7c6f60">[email&#xA0;protected]</a>

Madras High Court|26 July, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN., nvi
2.In view of the above endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
26.07.2017 To The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
Crl.OP No.3319 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1558607b7c74787874795558607b7c7e747b7b60">[email&#xA0;protected]</a> vs <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e4f60606f636f626f674e456b6b7c6f6765656f7c6f60">[email&#xA0;protected]</a>

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.