(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The petitioner seeks to assail the order of the State Human Rights Commission Tamil Nadu dated 23.6.2015 and the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the complaint could not have been dealt with without giving notice to the opposite side. On being asked to show the requirement to do so, nothing has been placed before us.
2. It is trite to say that while violation of human rights is an important issue, it can't be said that every complaint, irrespective of even preliminary verification, would require a notice to be issued. In this case reports were called and perused. Separate report was also called from the Director of Vigilance and Anti-corruption department.
3. The crux of the whole thing was that the petitioner was arrested in a land grabbing case and his effort to seek enlargement could not succeed and that is why he was making false complaints to prevent action in respect of the land grabbing episode. The Commission having satisfied itself, we are of the view that it is not a fit case for interference under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The petition is dismissed. No costs.