Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bdaf5f9fae1f3fafce2dbd6fae9e2">[email&#xA0;protected]</a> vs Poongavanam Padayachi

Madras High Court|05 October, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This Second Appeal was listed on 04.10.2017 and though the counsel for the respondent was present, there was no representation for the appellant and the Registry was directed to list the matter today under the caption "for dismissal".
2. Today, the counsel for the respondent is present. However, there is no representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent. Resultantly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with costs.
05.10.2017 sli Index:yes/no Internet:yes Speaking order/Non-speaking order.
To
1. The Sub ordinate Judge, Ariyalur
2. The Additional District Munsif, Ariyalur S.A. No. 288 of 2001
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bdaf5f9fae1f3fafce2dbd6fae9e2">[email&#xA0;protected]</a> vs Poongavanam Padayachi

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 October, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.