Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

A Adalarasan vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others

Madras High Court|13 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.
2. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
13.09.2017 msvm Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No M.DHANDAPANI,J.
msvm To
1. Secretary to Government, Home (Transport) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.
2. Commissioner of Transport, Chepauk, Chennai-5.
3. Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Chennai-2.
W.P.No.22500 of 2004 13.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

A Adalarasan vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
13 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani