1 Kalaimani 2 S Kayalvizhi vs M Thiraviyam Managing Director

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent herein passed the final order pursuant to the order passed by this court, dated 22.03.2017 in W.P.No.25341 of 2016.

D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J.

vaan 2. In view of the above, the contempt petition is closed. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the respondent herein in the manner known to law.

20.11.2017 Speaking/Non Speaking order Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vaan Contempt Petition No.1553 of 2017 Contempt Petition No.1553 of 2017 Dated : 10-02-2014