THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
O.S.A.No.226 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.15298 of 2017
1/M/s.GPR Logistics 2.Mrs.P.Ranjini 3.Mrs.D.Kalpana Rep. By their power of Attorney Mr.G.Purushotham ... Appellants vs.
Mr.A.Suresh Anan Proprietor, M/s.Undwe Conscorp ... Respondent Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of O.S.Rules read with Clauses 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 03.11.2016 made in C.S.No.677 of 2009.
For Appellant : Mr.Praveen Sethia http://www.judis.nic.in
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
and ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsm
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.]
1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellants seek to withdraw the appeal without prejudice to their rights and contentions.
1.1. Learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect on the paper book.
2. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected pending application shall stand closed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
(R.S.A., J.) (A.Q., J.) 22.09.2017 vsm http://www.judis.nic.in
O.S.A.No.226 of 2017