Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Yogendra Nath Rai vs State Of U P & Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 44047 of 1997 Petitioner :- Yogendra Nath Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- R.C.Upadhyay
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“(a) A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 11.8.1973 passed by the respondent no. 1.
(b) A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to restraned the petitioner in Service and pay the salary of his alongwith arrears and all benefit of the service.
(c) issue a writ order or direction to pay the salary to the petitioner month by month and arrears in the 16% interest according to the direction of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.7.2018 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Yogendra Nath Rai vs State Of U P & Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • R C Upadhyay