Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Wazid Ali vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52119 of 2019 Applicant :- Wazid Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Waseem Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Wazid Ali, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 0764 of 2018, under Sections 366, 376, 506 IPC, Police Station Subhash Nagar, District- Bareilly, during pendency of trial.
Submission is that victim was consenting party and aged about 19 years, as per medical report. She went with the applicant from Delhi to Bareilly. The statement of the receptionist of Ashiyana Guest House was recorded by the Investigating Officer, who has stated that victim came with the applicant and stayed in Hotel. When the victim was in the bathroom, applicant ran away from hotel with her mobile and purse. Thereafter, the first information report was lodged against the applicant. The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The victim went with the applicant and stayed with him. Thereafter, on account of fear of family members, victim has falsely implicated him. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit and he is languishing in jail since 14.11.2018. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 Ruchi Agrahari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Wazid Ali vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 November, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Mohammad Waseem