Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Vishwas And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10577 of 2018
Petitioner :- Vishwas And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Atmaram Nadiwal,Prashant Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Atmaram Nadiwal, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri G.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 15.3.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 103 of 2018 under sections 323, 325 I.P.C. and 3 (2) 5 A, 3 (1) D S.C./S.T. Act, police station Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the F.I.R. of the present case has been lodged against unknown persons. The names of the petitioners have come into light during the course of investigation. They have been falsely implicated in the present case, hence the present F.I.R. is liable to be quashed.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for quashing of the F.I.R. which discloses cognizable offence and submitted that in the present case the victim has sustained fracture on his person.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioners.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 25.4.2018 Shiraz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vishwas And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 April, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Atmaram Nadiwal Prashant Kumar Singh