Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Virendra Pratap Mall And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26679 of 2021 Applicant :- Virendra Pratap Mall And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Lal Behari Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Heard Sri B.K. Yadav, Advocate holding brief for Sri L.B. Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 5339 of 2020 (State vs. Ram Narayan Mall and another) pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau District Mau, arising out of Case Crime No. 570 of 2011, under Sections 147, 427 and 120B of Indian Penal Code, Police Station- Madhuban, District Mau as well as impugned charge sheet no. 145 of 2011 dated 12.9.2011 and cognizance order dated 25.11.2011 in Criminal Case No. 5339 of 2020 (State vs. Ram Narayan Mall and another) as well as Non-bailable warrant dated 1.10.2021.
At the outset learned counsel for the applicants gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned charge-sheet and cognizance order against the applicants and confined his submission requesting to grant some protection to the applicants to surrender before the concerned court below. The learned counsel for the applicants further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction may be issued to the concerned court below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.
Learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. submits that in case the applicants are not pressing the relief as sought for by them on merits and wants to surrender before the concerned court below, he has no objection in granting protection to them for a short period.
In view of above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within four weeks from today and in case apply for bail, the bail application of the applicants shall be disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law and keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.
For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, the applicants namely, Virendra Pratap Mall, Manvendra Mall, Yasbeer Pratap Mall and Balbeer Mall shall not be arrested in the above case.
With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.12.2021 Shalini
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Virendra Pratap Mall And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2021
Judges
  • Krishan Pahal
Advocates
  • Lal Behari Yadav