Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Vinod vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10354 of 2021 Applicant :- Vinod Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ankit Srivastava learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Vinod, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no. 24 of 2021, under Section 306 I.P.C., Police Station- Ramgarhtal, District- Gorakhpur, during the pendency of trial.
3. At the outset, it has been stated by learned counsel for the applicant that the co-accused Ramnaval and his wife have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 10985 of 2021 vide order dated 25.8.2021; as to the status of the present applicant, it is submitted that he is only a tenant of the main accused Ramnaval; he had no concern with the occurrence at all.
4. In the event of arrest of the applicant - Vinod, involved in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail till conclusion of the trial, on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned on the following conditions:
(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.
(ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court.
(iv) In default of any of the conditions mentioned above, the investigating officer shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.
5. Present application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 17.12.2021 Faraz Digitally signed by SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH Date: 2021.12.17 18:42:15 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vinod vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 December, 2021
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Manoj Kumar