Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Vinod Kumar vs Smt Pramila Nigam

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34 Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 131 of 2015 Appellant :- Vinod Kumar Respondent :- Smt. Pramila Nigam Counsel for Appellant :- Ram Chandra Yadav,Pankaj Baranwal Counsel for Respondent :- Amit Kr.Srivastava Order on Application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this application.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 22.02.2018 AK
Court No. - 34 Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 131 of 2015 Appellant :- Vinod Kumar Respondent :- Smt. Pramila Nigam Counsel for Appellant :- Ram Chandra Yadav,Pankaj Baranwal Counsel for Respondent :- Amit Kr.Srivastava Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
The application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal having been rejected vide order of date, this appeal being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 22.02.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Vinod Kumar vs Smt Pramila Nigam

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ram Chandra Yadav Pankaj Baranwal