IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.14463 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
M/s. Vinayaka Enterprises, No.804, 8th Floor, Barton Centre, No.84, M. G. Road, Bengaluru – 560 001. Represented by its Partner Naresh J. Shah (By Sri. Sriranga S, Advocate) AND:
… Petitioner 1. The State of Karnataka, Represented by Secretary to the Government, Revenue Department Bengaluru – 560 001.
2. The Sub Registrar, Devanahalli Taluk, Devanahalli, Bengaluru Rural District – 562 110.
… Respondents (By Smt. Prathima Honnapura, AGA) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct or an order to consider the representations dated 1.12.2018 (Annexure-K) and 30.1.2019 (Annexure-L) submitted by the petitioners to R-2 and etc.
This Petition coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Sri. Sriranga S., learned counsel for the petitioner.
Smt. Prathima Honnapura, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks for a direction to the respondents to consider the representations dated 01.12.2018 and 30.01.2019 submitted by the petitioner to respondent No.2.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations dated 01.12.2018 and 30.01.2019 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents submitted that the representations submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the representations submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Mds/-