Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Villupuram Thenpennai Aaru vs The District Collector

Madras High Court|02 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Acting Chief Justice) Heard Mr.D.Senthilkumaar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4.
2. The petitioner has filed the writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from permitting the third respondent from illegal quarrying sand in the middle of Thenpennai River, Villupuram District by forming road in the river and to seize the vehicles involved in the illegal mining of sand from the river and consequently, to direct the authority to conduct an enquiry in respect of illegal sand mining and quarry by the third respondent and to cancel the license issued to the third respondent for sand quarry.
3. According to petitioner, the third respondent is running a sand yard near Kapur village and by using the name of the yard, he is illegally quarrying river sand from Thenpennai river in the places between Maarangiyur and Enathimangalam Bridge, Tirukovilur Taluk. The third respondent is using Taurus lorries for loading the sand from the centre river bed and unloading it in the yard at Kapur village. Because of the acts of the third respondent the livelihood of the farmers has been affected. The illegal sand quarrying of the third respondent should be prevented. In this regard, the petitioner sent several representations to the first respondent. Despite receipt of the representations, the first respondent has not taken any action against the third respondent. Hence, the writ petition.
4. On 29.11.2016, this Court impleaded the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirukoilur as respondent No.4 and respondent No.4 was directed to inspect the site and submit a report to this Court with plans and photographs. On 27.12.2016, respondent No.4 has filed his report along with photographs, which was put to the petitioner, who filed his objections.
5. Thereafter, reply affidavit was filed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirukoilur, affirmed on 1.3.2017, stating that the operations of Karadipakkam sand quarry by the Public Works Department has been closed on 22.2.2017 and over all there are no quarrying operations in Thenpennai river between Marangiyur and Enathimangalam Bridge and also in Karadipakkam village.
6. A perusal of the reply affidavit show that the respondent authorities have taken earnest steps to contain illegal quarrying operations in Thenpennai river between Marangiyur and Enathimangalam Bridge and no such activities are being done now. We take on record the said reply affidavit filed by the Revenue Divisional Officer and direct the respondent authorities to ensure that illegal quarrying is not done.
7. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
(H.G.R., ACJ.) (R.M.D., J.) 02.03.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes bbr To:
1.The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.
2.The Assistant Engineer/Executive Engineer, (Water Resources Department) Irrigation Division  I, Public Works Department, Villupuram  605 602.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Villupuram.
HULUVADI G.RAMESH,ACJ.
AND R.MAHADEVAN,J.
bbr W.P.No.41705 of 2016 02.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Villupuram Thenpennai Aaru vs The District Collector

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
02 March, 2017