Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 25719 of 2019 Petitioner :- Vijay Pal Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the FIR dated 30.01.2019 registered as Case Crime No. 0052 of 2019, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Parikshitgarh District Meerut with a further prayer, not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the first information report.
The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioner no.1 is the proprietor of M/s Akshya Urja Shop and has purchased some products amounting to Rs. 61,000/- from the respondent no.3. Later on when the petitioner no.1 found that the products were of inferior quality some altercation took place between them and the respondent no.3 lodged the impugned FIR containing absolutely false and concocted allegations implicating the petitioner no.1 as well as his sons, petitioner no.2 and 3. It is further contented that the matter is in the nature of civil dispute and the present FIR has been lodged only to harass the petitioners. Hence the FIR deserves to be quashed.
Per contra learned A.G.A contended that the allegations made in the first information report cannot be aborted at this stage. The petitioners will have sufficient opportunity to rebut the allegations.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha Vs. State of U.P., 2006 (56)ACC 433 reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal Vs. State of U.P., 2000 Cr.L.J. 569, after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, AIR 1992 SC 604 that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the FIR or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence no ground exists for quashing of the FIR or staying the arrest of the petitioners.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
However, it is provided that if the petitioners appear or surrender before the Court concerned within thirty days from today and apply for bail in the aforesaid case, their prayer for bail shall be considered by the court below expeditiously, in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 17.12.2019 Kirti