(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) We perused the status report filed by the Chenai Corporation. The report shows that at present there is no unauthorized construction as alleged by the petitioner, but, on the other hand, the building has been de-sealed to remove the additional construction made and only rubble was being removed.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that there are certain blocks which have been built without any planning permission, an allegation which is not in question. In this behalf, it is stated that the application for planning permission submitted by the sixth respondent is pending before the Government authorities and on our query, the learned Additional Advocate General states that a decision will be taken on the same within a period of one month from today. As to what is to happen to the additional block construction without planning permission would thus, in turn, depend on the fate of that planning permission.
3. Be that as it may, the result of the decision on the planning permission may be informed to the petitioner, who has been agitating on the issue of the neighbour having unauthorized construction, soon after the decision is taken as aforesaid.
The petition is accordingly closed. No costs.
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Building No.1 Gandhi Irwin Road Chennai-600 008.
3 The Director of School Education DPI Complex, College Road Madras-600 008.
4 The Director Fire and Rescue Services No.17 Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road Egmore, Madras-600 008.
5 The Assistant Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board No.21, Santhome High Road Santhome, Chennai-600 028.
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND M.SUNDAR,J.
(sasi) W.P.No.41950 of 2016 2.1.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in