Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Veena Kumari @ Meena Devi vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19771 of 2020 Applicant :- Veena Kumari @ Meena Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sangam Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA appearing for the State.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings as well as summoning order dated 05.11.2019 in respect of case no. 224o of 2019 (State Vs. Sani Wadhwani and others) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Chakiya, Chandauli and charge sheet dated 05.11.2020 under Section 498-A, 323, 504 IPC and Section 3/4 D. P. Act, arising out of case crime no. 59 of 2019, Police Station Baburi, district Chandauli. Further prayer has been made to stay the proceedings of the aforesaid case.
Only prayer pressed by the learned counsel for the applicant is that a direction be given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer.
From a perusal of the material available on record and keeping in view of the facts of the case, at this stage it cannot be said that offences levelled against the applicant is not made out. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr. P.C. At this stage only a prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of R. P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866; State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426; State of Bihar Vs. P. P. Sharma 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para 10) 2005 SCC (Cr. ) 283. The prayer made in the application is refused.
Hence it is directed that in case the applicant surrenders before the court below and apply for bail within 30 days from today the same shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law. For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken/given effect to against the applicant. It is made clear that no further time will be allowed to the applicant for surrender before the court concerned.
With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.
The party shall file self attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned court/authority/official shall verify the authenticity of such computerised copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 5.1.2021 Sachdeva Digitally signed by Justice Om Prakash Date: 2021.01.05 13:59:18 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Veena Kumari @ Meena Devi vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 January, 2021
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Sangam Singh