Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Vedavati @ Latha W/O Dr Puttaraju vs Dr Puttaraju

High Court Of Karnataka|03 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.40202 OF 2014 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
SMT. VEDAVATI @ LATHA W/O. DR. PUTTARAJU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO.93, GROUND FLOOR 4TH ‘A’ MAIN, 5TH CROSS FURTHER EXTENTION OF MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 086.
PRESENTLY CORRESPONDING ADDRESS SMT. VEDAVATI @ LATHA M/S. M.T. NANAIAH ASSOCIATES NO.14, MAMATHA APARTMENTS 4TH MAIN, GANDHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 009. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI PRABHUGOUD B. TUMBIGI, ADV.) AND:
DR. PUTTARAJU AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O. CHIKKAMADEGOWDA R/AT NO.93, GROUND FLOOR 4TH ‘A’ MAIN, 5TH CROSS FURTHER EXTENTION OF MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 086. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. POORNIMA M., ADV. - ABSENT) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO MODIFY THE ORDER DATED 03.10.2013 PASSED ON I.A. FOR MAINTAINANCE FILED IN M.C.NO.3072/2011 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE, PRODUCED VIDE ANNEX-D AND CONSEQUENTLY ENHANCE THE INTERIM MAINTAINANCE AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR RELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of efflux of time, as the main proceeding before the Family Court itself has been decided.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE ST
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Vedavati @ Latha W/O Dr Puttaraju vs Dr Puttaraju

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
03 April, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe