Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Varappur Firka Sugarcane Formers ... vs The Commissioner Of Sugars/

Madras High Court|10 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.
2.In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
To
1.The Commissioner of Sugars/ Cane Commissioner of Tamil Nadu, 690, Anna Salai, Chennai ? 35.
2.The Assistant Director of Agricultural and Inspector of Sugars, Marriamman Koil (Via), Kattuthottam, Thanjavur.
3.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Varappur Firka Sugarcane Formers ... vs The Commissioner Of Sugars/

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
10 November, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.