Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

V P Murugesan vs The District Collector

Madras High Court|09 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the writ petition was called on 03.11.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court has posted the matter under the caption “For dismissal” on 09.11.2017. But, even today when the writ petition was called, there was no representation for the petitioner. 2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
09.11.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No jer To 1. The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.
2) The District Collector, Salem District, Salem.
3) The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.
4) The District Collector, Erode District, Erode.
5) The District Collector, Nilgiris District, Nilgiris.
V.PARTHIBAN, J., jer Order in W.P.No.24246 of 2006 09.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

V P Murugesan vs The District Collector

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
09 November, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban