Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

U.V.V.Satyanarayana Raju vs 3 The Principal

Madras High Court|08 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented that the prayer sought for by the petitioner has been complied with, by passing appropriate orders by the respondents and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order passed. No costs.
Central Board of Secondary Education Shiksha Kendra 2 Community Centre Preet Vihar Delhi-110 092 2 The Regional Officer Central Board of Secondary Education Anna Nagar (WEST), Chennai-600040 W.P.No.35968 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

U.V.V.Satyanarayana Raju vs 3 The Principal

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
08 March, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.