Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Uppilipadmanabhan vs The Inspector General Of Registration And Others

Madras High Court|11 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would work out his remedy by filing a Civil Suit against the respondents 4 and 5 and also implead all the necessary parties.
2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is open to the petitioner to file a Civil Suit against the respondents 4 and 5 and also making all the necessary parties as defendants in the suit, in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Index : Yes/No 11.09.2017 Internet : Yes/No KM To
1. The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Santhome, Chennai.
2. The District Registrar, South Chennai, Saidapet, Chennai.
3. The Sub Registrar, Guduvancherry Sub Registrar Office, Guduvancherry.
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
KM W.P.No.22668 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.23770 of 2017 11.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Uppilipadmanabhan vs The Inspector General Of Registration And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
11 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Duraiswamy