Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Upendra Nath Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7725 of 2018 Petitioner :- Upendra Nath Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sujit Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prem Prakash Yadav
Hon'ble Dilip B. Bhosale,Chief Justice Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard Mr. Sujit Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. P.P. Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and Mr. Ramanand Pandey, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for respondents-State.
The principal prayer made in the writ petition reads thus:
“i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the Election Officer, respondent no. 4 not to permit the members enrolled after 30.10.2017, the date on which the term of the elected committee of management has been expired, to participate in the election of the society in question.”
We are not inclined to entertain the prayer, as made in the writ petition, on two grounds, firstly, the members enrolled after 30.10.2017 are made party to the petition. Even after we so expressed, counsel for the petitioner does not seek leave to add them as party-respondents in the writ petition. Secondly, the stage of raising objection for inclusion or deletion of names from the voters' list has yet not reached.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.2.2018 RK (Suneet Kumar, J) (Dilip B Bhosale, CJ)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Upendra Nath Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2018
Judges
  • Dilip B Bhosale Chief
Advocates
  • Sujit Kumar Rai