Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Umar vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19509 of 2021 Applicant :- Umar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 23.3.2020 and order of cognizance dt. 9.9.2020, case crime no. 0030 of 2020, under section 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) S.C.S.T. Act P.S. Saraimeer, District Azamgarh, pending in the court of Special Judge S.C.ST Act, Azamgarh.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press the other prayers made in the application and has confined his prayer only to the relief that in case, the applicant appears before the court below and applies for bail, his bail application be considered and disposed of at the earliest.
Per contra, learned AGA has opposed for expeditious disposal of bail application of the applicant.
In view of the above statement, it is directed that if the applicant appears before the court below and applies for bail, his prayer for bail be considered expeditiously in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 CrPC is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 25.10.2021 R
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Umar vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 October, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Atul Pandey