Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13437 of 2017 Applicant :- Udai Narain Singh Opposite Party :- C.B.I., A.C.B. Branch , Ghaziabad Counsel for Applicant :- Govind Saran Hajela Counsel for Opposite Party :- Amit Misra,Gyan Prakash
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Shri Govind Saran Hajela, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and Sri Gyan Prakash, learned counsel for the C.B.I.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the bail to the co-accused person, Kaushlendra Kumar has been granted by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 41904 of 2017 vide order dated 23.04.2018, hence the present applicant is also entitled for the same relief. He submits that the applicant is languishing in jail since 7.11.2016 and the applicant undertakes to cooperate with the trial.
Learned counsel for the C.B.I. opposed the bail but could not controvert the aforesaid facts.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the sentence awardable to the applicant, we are of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant Udai Narain Singh involved in Special Case No. 01 of 2016 (C.B.I. Vs. Udai Narain Singh) R.C. No. 1202015A0005, under Sections 120-B, 409, 420, 468 & 471 I.P.C. & Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, P.S. A.C.B./C.B.I., District Ghaziabad be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs. one lakh with two sureties of (out of which one should a family member) to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229- A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicants are deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the aforesaid case and conclude the same on day to day basis strictly in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 309 Cr.P.C. within a further period of one year from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 25.4.2018 A. Mandhani