Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

U P State Road Transport Corporation vs Dillipat And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 56852 of 2017 Petitioner :- U.P. State Road Transport Corporation,Chitrakoot Dham Mandal Respondent :- Dillipat And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheo Ram Singh,Shashank Shekhar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
This is a writ petition against the order passed under Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (in short "the Act") allowing the claim of the employee.
The petitioner-U.P.S.R.T.C. is aggrieved by the aforesaid order.
Section 7(7) of the Act provides for appeal against the order passed under Section 7 of the Act.
That being the case, the petitioner may first exhaust the statutory remedy available to him before the Government or appropriate appellate authority.
As such, the writ petition at this stage is not maintainable and it is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 29.11.2017 Sunil Kr. Gupta
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

U P State Road Transport Corporation vs Dillipat And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2017
Judges
  • Abhinava Upadhya
Advocates
  • Sheo Ram Singh Shashank Shekhar