Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

T.V.Muthu Krishnan vs The State Election Commissioner

Madras High Court|04 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayer in the writ petition has already become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.
04.09.2017 tsi To
1. The State Election Commissioner, Tamil Nadu State Election Commissioner, Vadapalani, Chennai.
2. Returning Officer-cum-Commissioner of Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-3.
W.P.No.27624 of 2004
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

T.V.Muthu Krishnan vs The State Election Commissioner

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 September, 2017