This revision arises against the order of learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vanur, Villupuram District, passed in Crl.M.P.No.1082 of 2016 on 24.11.2016, rejecting return of vehicle.
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Advocate [Crl.side].
3. Learned Government Advocate [Crl.side] submits that the vehicle, return of which is sought by the petitioner, has been confiscated.
Recording the submission of learned Government Advocate [Crl.side], the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. 02.01.2017 Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no gm To
1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vanur, Villupuram District.
2.The Station House Officer, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Kottakuppam, Villupuram District.
3.The Additional Superintendent of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Villupuram, Villupuram District.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
C.T. SELVAM, J gm Crl.R.C.No.1693 of 2016 02.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in