Court No. - 85
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 20062 of 2020 Applicant :- Teepu Kumar Vishwas @ Bangali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Lavkush Kumar Bhatt Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Heard Shri Lavkush Kumar Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 24.2.2020 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1579 of 2020(State vs. Teepu Kumar Vishwas alias Bangali) arising out of Case Crime No.0027 of 2020 under Section 15(2), 15(3) of Indian Medical Council Act 1956 and 420 IPC, Police Station Rajepur, District Farrukhabad pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhaabad.
The contention of counsel for the applicant is that whole exercise has been done by the office of CMO, Farrukhabad without conducting any enquiry. He further submitted that the applicant is neither Jholachap doctor nor is directly or indirectly involved in the medical treatment and he only runs a small grocery shop selling daily used items. He next submitted that ingredients of cheating and violation of medical Council Act itself is neither applicable or attracted in the present case.
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case, at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
After arguing the case for quite some time at length, learned counsel for the applicant himself has given up to address the Court on merits of the case and prayed, that the purpose of his client would suffice, if a direction may be given to the courts below to decide the bail application within specific time frame.
At this stage, disputed question of fact cannot be considered, therefore, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another, (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cri.) 283, the prayer for quashing entire proceedings and charge sheet is refused.
However, it is directed, that in case applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 45 days from today and applies for bail the court below shall consider and decide the bail prayer of applicant in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Smt. Amarawati and another v. State of U.P., reported in 2004 (57)ALR 290, as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, reported in (2009) 3 ADJ 322 (SC). For a period of 45 days from today or till the disposal of the application for grant of bail whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. However, in case, the applicant does not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.
With the above directions, present application is disposed off.
Order Date :- 5.1.2021 P.P.