IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.56001/2017 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
1. Mr. T C MEHTA S/O Mr. R L MEHTA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.T-3, LAKSHMI COMPLEX, K R ROAD, FORT, BANGALORE-560 002 2. Mr. RAMAN GUPTA S/O Mr. HEMCHAND GUPTA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.415, RANKA PARK MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027 3. SMT LATHA GUPTA W/O Mr. RAMAN GUPTA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.415, RANKA PARK MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027 4. Mrs. MADHU MEHTA W/O Mr. T C MEHTA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/T NO.T-3, LAKSHMI COMPLEX, K R ROAD, FORT, BANGALORE-560 002 ... PETITIONERS [BY SRI M.RAMA KRISHNA, ADV.] AND:
1. Mrs. UMA @ UMAKRISHNA W/O LATE C T KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 2. Mr. B K NAVEEN KUMAR S/O LATE C T KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 3. Mr. B K VINAY KUMAR S/O LATE C T KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 4. Mr. B K KIRAN KUMAR S/O LATE C T KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESPONDENT No.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT NO.180/J, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE BASAVESHWARANAGARA BANGALORE-560 079 5. Mr. MEGHANATHAN S/O Mr. P LOGANATHAN AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.3/1, 9TH CROSS MANJUNATH NILAYA, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560023 6. Mr. PADMANABHAN S/O Mr. K B RAMUSA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.16/1, CRESENT ROAD, KUMARA PARK EAST AMERICAN COLONY BANGALORE-560 001 …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI H.S.SANTHOSH, ADV. FOR R-1 TO R-4; SRI K.K.VASANTH, ADV. FOR C/R-5.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-D THE ORDER DATED 04.11.2017, PASSED BY 9TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BANGALORE (CCH:5) ON INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 9 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC IN O.S.NO.6924/2012 AND DIRECT THE COURT TO GRANT THE RELIEF SOUGHT BY THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 04.11.2017 on the application filed under Order 26 Rule 9 read with Section 151 of CPC in O.S.No.6924/2012 on the file of the IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bangalore City [CCH.No.5] ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.6924/2012 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE PMR