IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.34933 OF 2016 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN:
1. SYED JAMEEL S/O SYED ILIYAS, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT S.N.NAGAR, NEW EXTENSION, SAGAR-577401, SHIMOGA DISTRICT. … PETITIONER (By Sri. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADV.) AND:
1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKF BOARD, DARUL AWKAF, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE-560052.
2. DISTRICT WAKF OFFICE, R/P, CEO, MUSLIM HOSTEL BUILDILNG, SIR, M.V.ROAD, SHIMOGA – 577201.
3. JAMAI MASJID AND ITS ALLIED PROPERTIES R/P SOCNETARY, MAJLIS-E-MUNTHAZIMA JAMAITHUL-UL-MUSLIMEEN, SAGAR TOWN, SHIMOGA DISTRIT – 577201.
4. SYED MUNAWAR S/O HAROON SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NEHRU NAGAR, 8TH CROSS, SAGAR – 585323.
5. MANSOOR IQBAL S/O AHMED SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NEHRU NAGAR, 9TH CROSS, SAGAR-585323.
6. ABDUL MOHSIN KHAN S/O ABDUL KAREEM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NEHRU NAGAR, 9TH CROSS, SAGAR – 585323.
7. SYED TAHIR S/O SYED GHOUSEMUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SWARAB CHICKEN CENTRE, MARKET ROAD, SAGAR – 577401.
8. P.NOOR AHMED S/O BUDHAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, MADRASA ROAD, JANNAT NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, SAGAR – 585323.
9. SYED SUHAIL S/O SYED KHALEEL, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT GULAMUDDIN ROAD, SAGAR – 585323.
10. MOHAMMED ALI S/O T.ABDUL KHADIR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, VEGETABLE MERCHANT JANNAT NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, SAGAR – 585323. … RESPONDENTS (Sri. CHETHAN B ANGADI, ADV. FOR R1 (ABSENT) Sri. SYED IMRON, ADV. FOR R4 – R10, R2 & R3 SERVED AND UNPRESENTED) - - -
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records and proceedings in so far it relates to present case of, direct to the respondents to appoint fresh Election Officer who can proceed with Election process to conduct the Election to The Jamai Masjid & its allied properties, Majlis-E-Munthazima, Jamaithul-UL- Muslimeen and etc.
This Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Sri.Rajaram Sooryambail, learned counsel for the petitioner.
None for the respondent No.1.
Sri.Syed Imran, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 10.
2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE RV