Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sweety Chauhan vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29939 of 2019 Applicant :- Sweety Chauhan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Vashisth Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
Heard Sri Sunil Vashisth, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri A.R. Chaurasia, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the victim is a major girl with whom the applicant had established relationship through Whats App messages and they are friends since childhood upto intermediate on account of which the applicant has been suspected in her abduction.
Learned A.G.A. have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the abductee has not yet been recovered.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the submission advanced, the nature and gravity of the accusation, I find no good ground for grant of bail to the applicant Sweety Chauhan, involved in Case Crime No.1076 of 2019, u/s 368 IPC, P.S. Sahibabad, district Ghaziabad.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected.
The applicant is at liberty to move bail application u/s 439 Cr.P.C., if so advised.
Order Date :- 26.7.2019 Gaurav
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sweety Chauhan vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2019
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Sunil Vashisth