Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Surendravir Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 56847 of 2017 Petitioner :- Surendravir Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Mohan Asthana
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri K.M. Asthana, learned counsel for the HDFC Bank- respondent no. 3 and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents no. 1 and 2.
By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the recovery citation dated 8.8.2017 for recovery of an amount of Rs. 7,56,026/- + interest as well as other charges.
The petitioner had taken a loan of Rs. 6,00,000/- in the year 2015. On default being committed, the recovery has been initiated.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner accepts the entire liability and is ready to deposit the entire amount provided he is given some reasonable time to deposit the amount.
Shri K.M. Asthana, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the Bank has no objection provided the petitioner deposits the entire outstanding amount within the time allowed by this Court and on default being committed by the petitioner in depositing the amount, the Bank may be given liberty to proceed further in the matter.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, ends of justice would be served in disposing of the writ petition with the following directions:
1. The petitioner shall deposit the entire outstanding amount in four equal instalments and the first instalment shall be paid on or before 31st December, 2017 and thereafter remaining three instalments shall be deposited within every six months.
2. After the deposit of the first instalment, the Bank shall provide a statement of account to the petitioner after adjusting the amount deposited by the petitioner and subsequent instalments shall be paid accordingly.
3. If the petitioner deposits the entire amount as aforesaid with the respondent, no recovery charges shall be taken from him.
4. Subject to payment as directed above, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner by the respondents.
5. In the event of petitioner committing any default in depositing the amount as directed above, the respondents will be at liberty to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law and the recovery proceeding shall be revived.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 29.11.2017 Sunil Kr. Gupta
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Surendravir Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2017
Judges
  • Abhinava Upadhya
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar