Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Sunita vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16139 of 2021 Applicant :- Smt. Sunita Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shesh Nath Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Applicant- Smt. Sunita seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 463 of 2017, under Sections 363, 366, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Bhamora, District Bareilly.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application and the applicant is ready to surrender before the court below and apply for regular bail.
In view of the statement made, in case, the applicant appears/surrenders before the court below and applies for regular bail, the same be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 7.10.2021 KU
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Sunita vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 October, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Shesh Nath Singh Yadav