Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sumit vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35781 of 2018 Applicant :- Sumit Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on the record.
Applicant- Sumit seeks bail in Case Crime No. 492 of 2017, under Sections 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station- Kaimganj, District- Farrukhabad.
This is second bail application. First bail application was rejected by this Court on merits vide an order dated 17.04.2018.
Having heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A., I do not find any fresh ground for grant of bail to the applicant.
The application for bail is, accordingly, rejected.
However, considering the fact that applicant is languishing in jail since 07.10.2017, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial of aforesaid case and conclude the same in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 27.10.2018 Vikas
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sumit vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 October, 2018
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar